This is not meant as a flame, I am generally curious.
This is not meant as a flame, I am generally curious.
The money is not 'public' in the sense of belonging to the government, but public in the sense that anyone can invest through the share market.
Do capital markets have a natural or a constructed social utility?
If their social utility is natural, then finding out what benefit they might have to society is a sort of empirical question. But if their utility is a purely political construction, then their perceived benefit can be moulded to fit a desired outcome.
No government funds are invested (unless you count public pension investments like CalPERS) during an IPO.
Actually, states like California stand to benefit from King's IPO by way of capital gains tax revenue.