Hacker News Reader

Comment by coloncapitald | Hacker News Reader

If you want to keep any extensions that you didn't install from Web Store, use the dev channel[1] of Chrome and they will work just fine. I use an extension and they warned me one month back to either install their Web Store version will fewer functionality or move to dev channel.

[1] http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel

View on HN

Why don't they simply give me a config flag to change the behaviour? I understand what they are trying to do but it annoys me to have to use non-stable releases just so that I can use a couple of useful extensions not available from the store.

Didn't you get the memo? Choice and customisability is decadent and goes against the wishes of Big Google. Why would you even need to customise a telesc^H^H^H^H^H^H Chrome Install anyway? Big Google knows best.

Larry Page Is Watching You

I'm curious. Which useful extensions are you talking about and why are they not listed in webstore? The one extension that I mentioned has two versions. The non-webstore version doesn't abide to Google's T&C [lets you download Youtube videos].

Some devs don't bother to put their extensions in the store, for instance this extension to play music files embedded in image files on 4chan: http://dnsev.github.io/4cs/

I doubt it violates any T&C but I could be wrong.

Nothing that OllyDBG and a free weekend cannot fix ;)

When/If this affects me, it will be an entertaining challenge to create a crack which disables the "allowed to install?" instruction. Seems quite simple.

Until it auto-updates in a few days and breaks your crack.

Or just use a browser that doesn't restrict what you can do to it. Like Firefox.

Firefox isn't that much better.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com