What payment service? Apple runs no payment service, nor has announced that they intend to in the future. There can't be "anti-competitor" action if they don't even have a competing product to begin with.
What payment service? Apple runs no payment service, nor has announced that they intend to in the future. There can't be "anti-competitor" action if they don't even have a competing product to begin with.
Bitcoin apps are a challenge to this. Say if Amazon made a wallet app that happened to let you buy EBooks?
http://store.apple.com/us/product/H8332LL/B/square-credit-ca...
The difference between bit coin and the paypal app is that bit coin is cash. If I embed bit coin code in say, the Kindle App, I can make purchases that Apple wants a 30% cut of.
So no, it has nothing to do with iTunes, and nothing to do with Apple's 30% cut. It's just a completely made-up reason.
On the other hand, if you're selling physical products, you're not allowed to use Apple's IAP. I was actually surprised when I read this, but the review rules did state that last time I looked.
Using an app to manage a payment system that's external to Apple is quite legitimate. That's why the PayPal app exists. And I would wager that Bitcoin apps would fall under the same general category, of being things that happen outside of IAP, and therefore the reason they're getting pulled from the store has to do with something other than the IAP rules.
The iBeacon is a clear step in that direction and besides it's not like Apple is upfront about it's business, iBeacon was in Apple devices for two years before anybody found out about them for crying out loud. They know their endgame and are always working towards it.
That being said, they will loose this one
They don't want sketchy looking payment apps on their storep, that's fairly easy to understand. It's behaviour like this post that makes the Bitcoin community even more hostile for companies to even consider approaching.
[0]: http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2013/10/28Apple-Reports-Four...
[1]: The "market cap" is misleading in this circumstance anyway, you could probably only sell a few million dollars of the stuff before the market completely bottomed out and panic ensued that it never rose up again. There's very little liquidity and a lot of weak hands.