The first two, I could accept from a certain IP lawyer viewpoint. The first contained an amusing non-admission admission, but they took down the game, and I'll let it slide, from my perspective. The second one was a stretch, but they provided existing examples, and I can see their point even if I don't agree with it.

That last one though was ludicrous: "We’re not trying to stop Stoic from using the word Saga but we had to oppose their application to preserve our own ability to protect our own games."

In order to save the village, we had to destroy it.

I don't play that many games on my phone or tablets, so I don't have a dog in this fight directly, but now I guess I'll never make my app SagaNoteAngryFruit.