Hacker News Reader

that would be incredible! the news as significant facts (where the editorializing was simply the process of selecting what information to share or is news worthy), and editorials are the editorials; clearly separated! I'm all for it.

But determining what is "significant" is editorializing...

Would you prefer that the news be a list of facts?

YES!

Great. We'll have that as soon as people agree what the facts are.

And a wonderful thing it is, but they're both a decade out. No-one can go now, nor anytime soon.

Who'd want to? I mean, there's dust, and rocks, and big round holes in the dust.

How's about we go someplace actually interesting next?

He3 Mining man! Well, hypothetically anyway.

... And enough He3 to make the oil business look like spare change.

... and no way to bring it back, and no technology on the near-to-medium term horizon either.