As a Clojure fan, while I appreciate the author's effort, and admit I would do a much worse job, I'm bothered by oversimplifications like these:

- "Like all Lisps, it employs a uniform structure"

- "All Clojure code is written in a uniform structure"

- "Forms have a uniform structure."

- "In other languages, different operations might have different structures depending on the operator and the operands."

- "No matter what operator you're using or what kind of data you're operating on, the structure is the same."

It's pretty obvious that forms don't have a uniform structure (e.g. the structure of a number is pretty different from the structure of a vector), and that the structure depends on the operator (e.g. `def` special form vs. `or` macro).

Yes, Clojure syntax is relatively simple, no need to oversell it.

Still, that's a minor issue that doesn't detract from the overall quality and usefulness of the work.