And in truth, many citizens are law breakers. And many of the laws that are broken today may not even exist in a couple of years. Where as, ensuring 'National Security' is a non-transitory objective.
And in truth, many citizens are law breakers. And many of the laws that are broken today may not even exist in a couple of years. Where as, ensuring 'National Security' is a non-transitory objective.
> And many of the laws that are broken today may not even exist in a couple of years.
In practice, laws are not rolled back but grow like an ever-expanding mesh. This also relates to your comment that many citizens are law breakers: we're moving toward a future where every citizen breaks the law on a daily basis, simply by virtue of living their lives. Combined with arbitrary draconian punishment guidelines, this opens up the fascinating possibility of selective enforcement as a means to weed out unwanted elements. It's a world where pretty much everyone can be taken out of circulation on a whim, and where the threat of overwhelming legal action can be used to enhance compliance.