>Show me the equivalent of initiatives like "Rails Girls" or "Girls Who Code", or "Github's free private repos for women" for male teachers or nurses. A halfhearted list of platitudes from a Dean at ASU and an NYTimes article != actual effort. Look at the list of sponsors on this page.
http://www.girlswhocode.com/about-us/ and show me something even remotely equivalent for nursing, or fashion.
Well googling for "programs to get men into nursing" returns these:
http://www.discovernursing.com/men-in-nursing#.UsGOpGRDsns
http://www.minoritynurse.com/article/men-nursing-school
Both of which show some good sponsorship. Heck, on the first page, under "resources" there is mention of a magazine called "male nurse magazine".
I'm pretty sure these aren't half-hearted platitudes.
Also consider: a profession that isn't tech may not have a giant list of tech heavyweights behind it. Again - different industries have different ways of doing things.
> All I'm saying is that, as a low-income Asian person who learned to code, I am not a particularly privileged or rich person. Yet I have had zero initiatives helping me, or encouraging me to code. I have seen several people in a similar position. On the other hand, plenty of girls with high-income parents are babysat and helped by initiatives like Rails Girls et al.
This is poor reasoning. Just because there are initiatives to help one group, and there aren't - for whatever reason - initiatives to help another group, doesn't mean that the initiatives that do exist are a problem. An attempt to solve one problem does not invalidate the other. Nor does the lack of solution to one problem invalidate attempts to solve other problems. It's like this: my software has 2 bugs. I spend a week fixing one bug. My boss doesn't complain that I didn't solve both bugs, but rather praises me for fixing one and says "now fix the other".