> I treated college math and physics as symbolic manipulation
> games, and graduated cum laude with majors in both subjects.
Interesting. I'm not saying this about you, but I've met several people who treated math as largely just symbol manipulation, and indeed, they ended up being great at solving the sorts of problems set, but I've sometimes had a feeling that they're sort of "barking at print". I've heard people reading perfectly well, but with no sense they they understand what they've read, despite the perfect production.
Similarly, some people can "do the math," but sometimes there's no sense of any real understanding. It's hard to explain.
This is one of the problems with interviewing. Some people can really talk the talk. They know all the words, all the phrases, can solve the problems, can produce the code for the set problems. And yet, after conversation, you start to feel that there's something just not quite right.
This is just one reason why interviewing is hard.