No, I'm going to argue that if you choose to make an argument implicitly premised on the different rape victimization by sex, you can't support it with just an unsupported statistic for one sex.
> About 3% of American men — or 1 in 33 — have experienced an attempted or completed rape in their lifetime.1
> In 2003, 1 in every ten rape victims were male.2
http://betweenletters.quora.com/More-Men-Are-Raped-In-the-US...
Incidentally, this (even assuming reliable victimization stats that weren't distorted by it) is one of the reasons why I wouldn't assume that the threat was necessarily less serious issued against a male based simply on victimization stats indicating that women were more likely to be victimized.