That the person's who wrote the article above thinks that the author of the other piece is flawed, isn't central to the majority of their argument. Thus using that the person who wrote the article thinks that way, as a reason to dismiss the entirety of their piece, probably qualifies as AH.
Where are the feminist fighting for 50% workforce presentation in construction? Answer that! Don't call me names. Just answer. Where are the feminist fighting for 50% of all divorce cases ending in fathers staying with children? Any arguments? Or just the usual aggression, name calling?
Why you are surprised feminism is not taken seriously. If you don't address the issues, the issues address you. And you are done. Despite personal attacks.
Fathers who seek custody tend to get it: http://www.villainouscompany.com/vcblog/archives/2012/04/chi...
Because according to the feminist ideology not enough women are interested. You see, it's exactly what the story is about. Feminism is Marxism ideology that wants to change society where we - both sexes - understand that women can be as good as men in all the jobs. So, I'd ask you and others to do the same for men. To understand that they can be as a good parent as a mother can.
Now, you see a little bit clearer the idiocy of that movement?
It's about changing us all, our societies to ones that even women who didn't want to go to IT, will go due to the social pressure.
Women are under tremendous pressure nowadays to compete with men in all these industries. It's like men would be expected now to take 50% of all the kids in divorce cases. Feminism like all left ideologies wants good by in reality it doesn't work. And people who are affected by their social experiments are the real victims here.