If they didn't do this a section would blame MS for another XP like situation.
Vista had some really good ideas, executed poorly. Win8 has some good ideas, executed poorly.
By all measures, Win9 should be a great OS. MS just has a nasty habbit of releasing experimental software as if it were ready for production.
Every part of Vista was a significant change leading to a lot of application incompatibilities. App developers hadn't dealt with changes like that for years, so fixes were slower than they should have been.
That was a major cause of Vista's poor reputation.
I think they have jumped the shark with 8.x as far as their desktop OS goes.