No, in that case scroogled.com would require a Google+ account.

I was kinda sad when I did a whois and found that it actually was on the Microsoft nameservers [1]. Really expected better out of Redmond.. shame on them.

[1] http://reports.internic.net/cgi/whois?whois_nic=scroogled.co...

Either way, it works in favour of Google to the detriment of MS.