I've had enough Mcdonalds for this lifetime. Bring on the Soylent vending machines!
I've had enough Mcdonalds for this lifetime. Bring on the Soylent vending machines!
Maybe my sarcasm detector is off but I don't see how this is a real question.
Delicious cheeseburger? Have you even eaten at a McDonalds?
I'd still much rather put bland goop into my body considering how terrible the contents of a Big 'n' Tasty combo meal is for my health.
Ever heard of the term 'balanced diet'?
http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html [More than one-third of U.S. adults (35.7%) are obese.]
http://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/statistics.htm [Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States.]
I choose -- false dichotomy. Plenty of healthy and not tasteless quick meal replacements that already exist.
Most things that innately taste good -- stuff that you could drop in a blender and drink and it'd still be agreeable -- are fatty, salty, starchy, sugary, or some mix of all these. Healthy and good-tasting food requires pleasant textures and careful composition that allows a small amount of fat, salt, starch, etc. to enhance the flavor of the whole meal.
"Fatty" is not a synonym for unhealthy by the way. A lot of people consider high fat/low carb diets to be healthier than the reverse.
The problem is, McDonalds meals are not healthy, full stop:
Mcdonald's - Big Mac Meal With Fries and Coke With No Onions
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/food/calories/mcdonalds-big-mac-...
1130 Calories, and 67 grams of sugar. Call me when McDonalds modifies their meals to consist primarily of protein/fat calories.
The burger itself is fine. You wouldn't go to Subway for a nice sandwich and drink a liter of Coke afterwards and a bag of chips and complain about how unhealthy it is.
Here you can get some nice fresh crispy raw carrots instead of fries.
Right...that's why I called the scenario a false dichotomy.
The word itself is starting to grate on me, as "lecker" in German already does thanks to its overuse.