That is truly a horrible article. Meant to be nothing but mean about Microsoft.

I am fairly critical of Microsoft myself, but usually for stuff that they actually do wrong. Keeping a webpage about an old game unchanged online, what is wrong with that? It's not like they came out with 3 updates to the game without modernising their webpages.

My list of negative things about the article:

  1. There is no author named
  2. Picture of Bill Gates is irrelevant
  3. Title is misleading
  4. Second paragraph is too open to interpretation
       - Should be "1 of 9^9^9 pages on microsoft.com remain untouched"
  5. Third paragraph uses "such as" to imply there are more titles
  6. Calling the hn thread fiery and inaccessible, what exactly is inaccessible about a thread on hn?
  7. Second to last paragraph only tried to poke fun at microsoft. Essentially like complaining that a tesla car only runs on electricity.
  8. Last paragraph, why not just add another 500 words explaining all the other browsers that the webpage might not work on without doing any testing.