>using a mechanism known to be insecure
Can you elaborate? I'm not sure what you're referring to.
Can you elaborate? I'm not sure what you're referring to.
> Levison isn’t an privacy absolutist. He has cooperated in the past with government investigations. He says he’s received “two dozen” requests over the last ten years, and in cases where he had information, he would turn over what he had.
> “I’m not trying to protect people from law enforcement,” he said. “If information is unencrypted and law enforcement has a court order, I hand it over.”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/08/09/lavabits-...