Did it drop off the home page so fast, or is it being flagged?
Did it drop off the home page so fast, or is it being flagged?
The fact that someone is trying so hard to make this become controversial and news-worthy is the only interesting thing here.
Flagging is just supposed to summon a moderator and that's all.
So, the Lessig post could've been flagged, the comments on it could've triggered the flame war code, or a moderator did it.
What almost definitely didn't happen is "Apple fan boys at work" flagging down anything anti-Apple. When you use the flag link any more than extremely sparingly, you lose the privilege, permanently.
Psychologically, the UI seems intended to separate "I don't like this" from "I think this content is detrimental to the site". This communicates that users should not attempt to punish links they simply dislike, but may do so with comments.
Company screws up some software upgrade, hundreds of uses swam their forums and complain. Who would be served from 100s of threads about the same thing with no solutions?
It's generally not "censhorship" unless the government does it. Your speech is not being suppressed by Apple not wanting spam in their forums. It's not some deep conspiracy to drive up Apple stock price.
So who really cares? Someone who has not upgraded to the latest iOS and needs WiFi access to drive his life critical system?
It's actually [citation needed]. ;).
Btw, only 15 minutes after your original post, and Lessig's post know is upvoted to 245 points already yet is 2 places down...
The time of the votes is not taken into account. The time-based decay is only based on the submission time. A story with the same votes and same submission time will have the same rank regardless of when the votes occurred, all other factors being equal.
It's not a simple votes/age thing.
[1] http://www.logicallyfallacious.com/index.php/logical-fallaci...