And that's not to mention broader macroeconomic issues which are more worthy of essays than HN comments.
The problem arises when the banks don't lend the money and just sit on it... or when companies like Apple siton their huge cash reserves...
To fix this we must boost aggregate DEMAND. Investors and banks give money to businesses when they see demand.
But redistributing money to people on the bottom to give them safety nets (and allow them to do things like re-educate themselves for some other career) as well as spend it back into the economy is a way to keep them from going completely bankrupt. When a company goes bankrupt, it's one thing. When a human does, it often results in starvation and homelessness.
And, give it a generation or three or four, and their kids will have blown it all, having grown up thinking $90M apartments are their expected standard of living, and be back to working at McDonalds.
1) Spend more of their money on what they really NEED, sending price signals into the economy for basics the majority of people need, vs say golden toilets
2) Spend faster and more of their money on themselves PERIOD because their basic needs take up a greater proportion of their money than for rich people
But anyway we need to balance the wealth transfer one way of the other. This is accomplished with safety nets and progressive taxation.
How does it help the USA working class when billionaires channel their money overseas
True and people conveniently ignore that the money not given to the government in taxes buys goods and makes investments which create jobs.
There is an entire economy built around the wealthy spending boatloads of money on luxury goods, cars, 2nd and 3rd homes, vacations, renovations and the like.