So it's actually "receive a warrant, lose your 4th Amendment rights". Uh, yeah, obviously, that's what we want, reasonable search and seizure.
tptacek thanks for being the voice of reason in these infosec law threads.
tptacek thanks for being the voice of reason in these infosec law threads.
Remember in the Netscape vs. Microsoft case, when the contents of Jamie Zawinsky's "Really Bad Ideas" mailing list were released? That was because of a discovery order demanding Netscape's email spools.
It's for exactly this reason that large companies have specific policies about document retention.