Especially when you have high ceilings, and the detector is the 120V AC kind and has no overly visible slot for a battery.
Especially when you have high ceilings, and the detector is the 120V AC kind and has no overly visible slot for a battery.
[A few years back our neighbouring apartment had a nasty fire - so I went out and bought a lot of fire alarms, fire blankets etc. - we weren't at much risk as our walls are about 1m thick sandstone. However, it did mean I ended up replacing all of the batteries in the "new" alarms at roughly the same time.]
Or, you can pay $5 for a lithium battery that will last the life of the alarm. If it chirps, time to replace the smoke alarm.
(You did realize that smoke alarms should be replaced every ten years, right?)
Just make sure they're lithium, non-rechargeable batteries, with an expiration date about 8 years in the future.
Nest is trying to market the same way as Apple does, they appeal to Vanity through different directions. Expecting people in the market segment to feed off each other.
They've clearly found a problem (current alarms suck) and have made a solution. Just because you don't see the convenience doesn't mean other people don't, as is clear from the comments here. Once you get burned by regular smoke detectors in the middle of the night, you would pay good money for a product that actually fixes some of these issues.
No. I change the batteries once a year.
http://artisanelectric.net/blog/the-big-picture/how-old-are-...
http://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/document-information...
And it's incredibly annoying when you have to climb onto a chair/table/whathaveyou because your ceilings are so high you can't naturally reach it.
The one in my last apartment even had a big button in the middle. I thought I might be able to press it in order to turn off the alarm temporarily. That was not a good idea.
Deleted comment
See how that might be annoying in the middle of the night with high ceilings in the first place, and no replacement battery available?