Adsense advertisers are constantly rewarded for walking the fine line between blending in and just outright tricking their users.
While maybe this isn't outright EVIL, it certainly is disingenuous.
Adsense advertisers are constantly rewarded for walking the fine line between blending in and just outright tricking their users.
While maybe this isn't outright EVIL, it certainly is disingenuous.
First of all, that argument would extend to adsense... What's wrong with a web publisher making ads look like legitimate content?
It'd also extend to more search results... What'd be wrong about having the first 10 results be ads instead of the first 1-2?
Oooh, it'd also extend to paid editorials. How about I pay the New York Times for a positive review of my company? Should that be labeled as an ad?
The point is that there is an implicit promise with content that it's there based on its merits rather than based on who paid to have it there. There's no victim if the ad is approximately as relevant as an organic search result-- but if it's going to the highest bidder, there's no guarantee that this is the case.