In this current age, its more likely that the NSA is behind it. We are at a point where we need evidence that the NSA didn't help.
This certainly bolsters the claim that the NSA's surveillance is doing society good. I'm not comfortable with that, but there it is.
So we now have to prove a negative or the NSA did it? Logic has officially left the building.
No seriously, the whole parallel construction dialogue for NSA feeding DEA tips is exactly the situation suggested here. Why do you equate published journalism with hoaxes and factually devoid crazies. It is insulting to a fairly civil discussion.