Hacker News Reader

> {"name":"marijn","gender":"female","probability":"1.00","count":1}

Except, of course, that I am male. My name is used for both genders. The thing completely failed on a few other ambiguous names I tried. I'll second AndrewDucker's opinion—just don't.

View on HN

This result is really saying that 1 out of 1 tested Marijns are female - since they have only tested one Marijn, you should consider the result in this light.

The numbers are honest enough to admit that the result is crap in this case - this type of statistical openness should be encouraged.

The same goes for the following, a name used for both genders in Italy:

{"name":"maria","gender":"female","probability":"1.00","count":700}

failed with my name, too.

{ "name": "kay", "gender": "female", "probability": "0.93", "count": 57, "country_id": "US", "language_id": "en" }

How is that a "fail"? The probability is listed as 93%.

100% of probability doesn't make it a certainty either.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com