Hacker News Reader

Hmm... Can't tell if Poe's Law...?

Existing smoke detectors are pretty ugly with bad UI.

Existing smoke detectors are also exceedingly simple, which is a great thing for lifesaving safety devices. Complexity is the enemy of reliability, and reliability is the primary requirement of safety devices.

View on HN

Well, as an anecdote to why simplicity (at least in it's current form) is bad... All but one of my smoke detectors in my apartment are unplugged because they kept going off when I was cooking (would happen at least once a week). I was more likely to die or get injured from climbing onto a wobbly stool to turn off the 4 overly sensitive smoke detectors than I ever was in a fire. I am getting the feeling that this thread is split into two types of people, those who get a lot of false positives from their detectors and those who don't.

I was a firefighter for seven years, many years ago.

One winter evening, we were dispatched to a chimney fire. After we extinguished it (with the homeowner's hose and a chimney nozzle) I did a walk through of the house and attic to check for extension.

I found his smoke detectors hanging open, with the batteries removed. When I asked the homeowner if he wanted some new batteries for them (we kept free batteries on the engine), he happily took them. When I asked him how long his smoke detectors had been without batteries, he quickly answered: "Since Christmas morning."

I have no doubt as to where the new batteries went...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com