> According to industry sources, Braintree has been asking for $1 billion, which seems unrealistic.
It would seem that other suitors are trying to pressure Braintree to lower their target
How is Square valued at $4b and BrainTree can't sell for $1b?
Square has a bit of a different opportunity than BrainTree as they are focusing on simplifying a real-world payments platform vs online and mobile payments. There seems to be less competition and a larger market for Square vs. Braintree I think.
The value Square adds to that market is much more substantial: free POS system, mobile wallet app, promotion in their marketplace, Jack Dorsey's autographed photo, etc.
Braintree (and Stripe) target ecommerce startups. Their value-add is streamlined APIs and tailored customer service. That value-add is nice but relatively smaller and less scalable to boot. As soon as those sites get big they will negotiate for lower rates they can get from a commodity processor. No doubt the big customers in their portfolio already have and we just don't know it.
Square's got a whole world of small business to expand into, a much larger market than ecommerce startups. And their margins are more sustainable; it takes an awful lot of growth for a merchant to justify switching out all their POS systems and other Square lock-in, just to shave a few basis points off their processing rate.
Bad: Paypal as a potential suitor will make some existing and potential customers very nervous and that won't be good for customer acquisition. Other potential suitors may see other heavyweights passing on the deal as a negative.
Good: The attention may increase the pool of suitors.
The thought of forcing thousands of customers to re-enter billing information makes me throw up in my mouth a little.
This would be similar to Oracle acquiring MySQL.