I can't find anything that indicates whether there's any substance to their claims. Certainly very smart people can do interesting work whose significance they greatly embellish and overestimate (AI researchers in the 70s and 80s).
I can't find anything that indicates whether there's any substance to their claims. Certainly very smart people can do interesting work whose significance they greatly embellish and overestimate (AI researchers in the 70s and 80s).
Even better relevancy may not be enough as most people believe current search technology is "good enough". It would have to be very innovative. If nothing else, they're a good acquisition target for an existing search company looking to further reduce costs and increase profits or allocate more resources towards more computationally expensive algorithms (spam filtering, semantics, content targeting, etc.)
I think if they can index significantly faster, then it's highly likely they'll be bought up by Google or the competition for their indexing tech before anything in mentioned in that first paragraph happens.