Comment by darklajid | Hacker News Reader

Comment by darklajid | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

I guess that's fine. You have always the option to leave a group of people/a society that has a different opinion.

Germany requires the same (Homeschooling isn't allowed, except in very specific cases -> A child that cannot be transported/isn't mobile at all for example).

For me that is The Right Way. The same education for everyone. If the public education sucks, we need to improve that not work around the issue.

And .. the majority of reasons for homeschooling are plain invalid in my world (often based on religious ideas, claiming that the curriculum is containing 'forbidden'/'evil'/'wrong' stuff).

'Free society' doesn't imply the right to do everything. You cannot drink and drive. You're not allowed to beat your (very own, hey you made those!) children. For some, myself included, the requirement to send your kids to a 'real' school is a necessary thing and not Restricting The Freedom.

You're free to disagree (both in Sweden and Germany), but in that case you need to decide if that freedom is important enough to warrant a move - or you can try to lobby against the majority/the status quo. Ignoring the state and law (as the family seemed to have done) or calling it wrong won't help.

> If the public education sucks

What if group education is the problem? Parents being allowed to teach their children is a human right, and it's only very strange countries that block it. It smacks of government indoctrination.

> And .. the majority of reasons for homeschooling are plain invalid in my world (often based on religious ideas, claiming that the curriculum is containing 'forbidden'/'evil'/'wrong' stuff).

I guess the government indoctrination is working on you. (Did they run some propaganda ads to make you believe such a strange thing?)

No, the reason most parents homeschool is that they can do a much better job, because you don't have to spend half of the day on useless structure and discipline. By doing that you free up so much time that kids can learn twice as much as non homeschooled kids. Or they can learn other subjects not normally taught, or they can explore their interests.

It's not for all parents of course, it requires a good commitment. But homeschooled kids end up with much better educations that regular schooled ones. There have been many studies in the US on this subject and the results are very clear: Homeschooling works much better.

> 'Free society' doesn't imply the right to do everything. For some, myself included, the requirement to send your kids to a 'real' school is a necessary thing and not Restricting The Freedom.

Of course it is restricting. You have just been brainwashed. A society can make up any rules it likes, and I guess you'll go along with it.

But you have to have a good reason for the rules. And there is no good reason at all for the ban on homeschooling.

So, because I disagree with your point of view I am 'brainwashed'? Should I continue on the same path and attack you, personally, for the 'obvious' mistake of thinking that way?

In my world parents can teach their children everything - on top of the regulated, quality-controlled standard education. Why? Because otherwise you cannot control that a child receives decent education. And no, brainwashing (to use your term here) your own child or deciding that math and biology are not relevant, but let's do just sports instead, is not a human right.

Education is. Home schooling offers little benefits and leads to huge problems (regulation, quality control are my biggest issues with it).

> It's not for all parents of course

Oh? Really? So .. we should decide on a case by case basis? Maybe ask for a 'driving license' to teach your kids? I think we have a degree in Germany that involves something similar...

> Homeschooling works much better

No. And quite frankly, I couldn't give a damn about the US here. Show me the sources and I'll probably find out that most of the 'home-schooled' were privileged rich kids where people bought their way out of the 'normal' way. And probably all the nutjobs (again, you have a couple of interesting religious groups in the US that like your concept as well) are excluded from the study. But hey, surprise me and find me a relevant study?

> Of course it is restricting

Oh man.. The US way again. Freedom > everything else, right? Without starting to point out that you don't live in a free country according to _my_ definition: We don't even agree on the priority of things here. Germany has no free speech as you know it. And I want that to remain the way it is. My (liberal, pirate party voting) peers largely agree. This isn't 'brainwashed' or stupid, that's a difference in culture, a model of values that doesn't match your own.

And let me close with a stab of my own: If this is the way you like to lead an argument, I doubt that you're able to school a kid. "Those Germans? Brainwashed. They do atrocious things, show naked skin on TV, supress free speech and take kids away. In the night. Before they eat them"

> So, because I disagree with your point of view I am 'brainwashed'?

No, it's because you disagree for patently stupid and obviously wrong reasons, and you don't even see it.

> Because otherwise you cannot control that a child receives decent education.

Sure you can. You give quarterly tests. And not on a case by case, automatically - no permission or application needed, but your kids need to pass the test.

> Oh? Really? So .. we should decide on a case by case basis? Maybe ask for a 'driving license' to teach your kids?

Nope. You ask the parents themself. There are a minority who are nuts, but 99.9% of people are perfectly able to decide if they can teach their kids the needed subjects.

The testing will help find the obviously unqualified and the rest run their own life, just like people have been doing for thousands of years.

Do you trust the parents to educate their kids about morals and behavior? Or are you going to have the state do that too? Actually, why not have professionals raise the kids in group homes and forget the parents completely?

> Show me the sources and I'll probably find out that most of the 'home-schooled' were privileged rich kids where people bought their way out of the 'normal' way.

Your brainwashing is showing again. You are simply wrong. Go lookup your own sources, nothing else will convince you.

Thank you for amusing me to no end.

> Actually, why not have professionals raise the kids in group homes and forget the parents completely?

Funnily enough, that is vaguely similar to what was offered in East Germany and the general trend here is to actually provide general daycare for your child, so that the mother (if we're talking classic roles) can take up a job again. It's even a big part for the upcoming elections here.

I'm not a fan of that myself, but I cackle with glee thinking about the fits that this discussion ("Hey, why don't you give us the child and go to work during the day") might throw you in.

Bottom line: Your values are not compatible with mine. They are not relevant for my decisions. I doubt they are relevant for Sweden either. Stop trying to believe you are morally superior in any way.

"For me that is The Right Way. The same education for everyone."

Aren't there private schools in Germany where the wealthy send their children? If there are, then why shouldn't everyone have the choice to opt out of the public school system, not just the wealthy?

Accredited private schools that are staffed with teachers that went through the same educational path as the public school teachers.

Not home schooling.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com