But my project doesn't need all that, you might say. Well, that's fine, then use something like Sinatra. But I wouldn't build a non-toy web application without the above things.
But my project doesn't need all that, you might say. Well, that's fine, then use something like Sinatra. But I wouldn't build a non-toy web application without the above things.
Rails specific and exclusive features are mostly conventions and the flow from routes to controller and views, which for me is very disagreeable.
I think it is a good thing for new and maybe even experienced Ruby developers to build their own, to see a way beyond all the meta magic and five minute blogs, and that you really don't need that much plumbing to get things moving and understandable.
At least it didn't say roll Rails in five minutes - it would take much longer than that to bake in all the security holes and to stick YAML parsers all over the shop.