I have heard of this journalist before. Apart from the absolute lack of an explanation as to WHY Walmart cannot pay higher wages (spoiler - it's complicated!)
also, I find the link in the S.H.A.M.E. project of interest.
also, I find the link in the S.H.A.M.E. project of interest.
From that I wondered if the article itself was just some form of PR or politically motivated rather than unbiased journalism.
Calling ad hominem is well and good and something to keep in the back of your mind, but I tend to agree with Daniel Davies that "giving known liars the benefit of the doubt" is more likely to steer you wrong.
Let's also get some context about where these theories are coming from. If people understood why people like her are shills and who they're shills for they might be a little more skeptical.