Bots Gobble Up Restaurant Reservations in the Bay Area
siliconbeat.com
siliconbeat.com
I (and I'm sure many others) would love it if there were some way for moderators to aggregate all upvotes for related articles that don't offer substantial new information or commentary on the original article instead.
It's pretty clear that a lot of journalists troll HN and related sites, find human interest stories that strike a nerve with the HN community, then write a blog post rehashing the same content without really adding anything new. It's a simple recipe for getting karma and page views that cheapens the experience here on HN. This type of journalistic pablum should not be rewarded with karma or attention.
[0] https://diogomonica.com/bot-wars-the-arms-race-of-restaurant...
Article: http://gothamist.com/2013/08/02/wealthy_foodies_can_buy_hard...
The Gothamist article came from this Food Republic article: http://www.foodrepublic.com/2013/07/30/man-gaming-new-york-c....
In other words, companies are starting to farm restaurant reservations to sell them, similar to the way that the market for event tickets has been corrupted.
The siliconbeat.com article here just seems to be a reblog/summary.
>Using OpenTable, Urbanspoon or SeatMe , diners could see available time slots and make a reservation online or from their smartphone without the hassle of calling the restaurant, and know that their table would be secure.
How is calling the restaurant a hassle? Especially when the solution is to use your phone to look the restaurant up online?
Maybe it's the cranky old man spirit in me, but I call restaurants every time -- I hadn't even heard of these sites. I didn't know that this was a need people felt needed fulfilling.
Which means calling a restaurant, waiting on hold, asking for your reservation, possibly not getting it, in which case you get to repeat the same for another restaurant.
For online systems the perk isn't really about not talking to a human, it's the ability to see availability at a glance so you only have to "call" once.
For not-insanely-busy restaurants where I know a seat is almost certainly available, I prefer calling. After all, their number is probably already in my address book, and making a phone call is a hell of a lot easier than diving through multiple pages on a shitty mobile browser.
Anyway, they're just entering your details into a system not unlike OpenTable. Why serialize this process into a conversation over a phone line?
"Don't talk to strangers" extrapolates to letting mom and dad answer the phone. Plus, in the era of dial-up, nobody could use the phone while you were going on Neopets.
A surprisingly large subset of my peers (think Google, Facebook interns) are afraid of calling up a restaurant -- they have no idea what the social norms for using a telephone are because they've never been taught.
On top of that, I get a record of the transaction via email. If I call instead, I just have to take it on faith that the other person didn't mistype the reservation details or forget to hit "save".
As far as I can tell, restaurants in my area go from "too quiet to have anyone in to answer the phone" to "too busy for anyone to be free to answer the phone" and back without ever passing through a state in between.
Speed is a big feature here too, as is the ability to easily switch between different restaurants quickly. The above actually happened, only we ended up looking through three different restaurants before finding one that we liked that we could get a reservation at a convenient time. If we'd been calling around it would either have taken a lot more of our time or we'd have settled on something that wouldn't have worked out as well (not to mention tied up restaurant employees during the lunch rush).
I wonder if we'll see more Ticketmaster-style countermeasures on reservation sites soon.
Or more restaurants varying their prices for high- and low-demand times like Alinea in Chicago (https://www.alinearestaurant.com/website/welcome/)
The ones I named would be seen by many people as unfair because they are options that are only available to people with a great deal of money. Other strategies (like calling in a favor) are only open to those with influence and special personal connections. In this case, we have a strategy that is only open to individuals with highly technical skills.
Note that I'm not saying it is unfair to use any of these strategies. I think reasonable people could disagree on many of them and they are sensitive to circumstances.
In some sense, though, this can be seen as a market distortion. For you or I, writing a bot to do this might be pretty simple. Since we don't have to "pay" very much for the reservations, we would be likely to over-consume them, that is, to make more reservations than we intend to keep. We might even double-book ourselves so we have options (e.g. this morning I felt like steak, now I feel like seafood).
This is obviously bad for the restaurants, but it is also bad for other customers who might have wanted the reservations more than we did, but were unable to build a bot to get them because, years and years ago, they chose to study things other than computer science.
I agree with the people that say charge a convenience fee. That would discourage the unfair behavior and still let people who actually intend to keep their reservation secure a spot.
The bots could get around this with proxies, but it would seem to be a pain to set up that many proxies.
Maybe there's a space in the market for someone to solve this problem for the restaurants.
Yes some may be able to use a few extra ips, but to win they would need access to thousands of them, which is far more difficult.