Hacker News Reader

Comment by arrrg | Hacker News Reader

Why exactly is that? By far most people do not care at all that other people are (theoretically) able to see what they are reading. I certainly don’t at all.

I do not think HTTPS is in any way a required feature for a feedreader. It’s pretty perfect as a premium feature.

View on HN

Personally, think we should encourage an ecosystem where https is a given, rather than feature. I would prefer that companies saw this as part-and-parcel with being a responsible service provider.

FWIW, I'm a big fan of Feedly, and have upgraded to Pro.

Let's tell Heroku to stop charging for the SSL endpoint.

There are plenty of reasons to prefer secure browsing by default. Perhaps I subscribe to feeds that would be flagged as "suspect" by programs like PRISM[1] and XKeyscore[2], and would like to make the NSA work at least a little bit to find that out.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XKeyscore

So, then if it's that important to you, give the people giving you the cover of HTTPS some money, stop being a cheapskate.

It so happens that I consider HTTPS by default for all users a requirement. A problem which a pro subscription does not solve.

And you can pay for that feature. I have no real stake in the game here, but I'm failing to see why that is a must-have feature for every user of the service.

Feasibly, the lack of HTTPS for a subset of users could be used as an attack vector against Feedly, which could surface information about me that I do not want revealed even if I were a Pro user using HTTPS.

Security shouldn't be a premium.

Huh? Isn’t this about privacy, not security?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com