I'm not sure that's necessary. Can you link on a resource that says positive rights always result in the violation of someone's negative rights? I guess the negative right of property would be violated by the tax cost of the internet.
http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/papers/twoconcepts.pd...
It's better to go to the originals on things like this then to read what they've become in the political folk mythology on the internets.
But if you have a right to be fed, it violates someone else's right to the food they own; if you have a right to medical care, nurses and doctors don't own their own time, etc.