For people who are not in poverty, which I presume includes most of us here idly browsing Hacker News, do we descend down that hierarchy of needs as soon as we step off the conveyor belt?
I think there are more paths to fulfilment than you realise.
For people who are not in poverty, which I presume includes most of us here idly browsing Hacker News, do we descend down that hierarchy of needs as soon as we step off the conveyor belt?
I think there are more paths to fulfilment than you realise.
I think the fact that every large society on the planet ever has been based on this model is important.
> is the only option for people in poverty really to wait for a promotion
You're overstating my position. Don't wait for an opportunity; create one. But yes, pretty much. There is simply no responsible alternative. You can't run off into the wilderness and fend for yourself. You have to live inside the system we have created. It's really not that oppressive. You should try it.
> I think there are more paths to fulfilment than you realise.
I think the paths that you see as one are many.
edit:
> do we descend down that hierarchy of needs as soon as we step off the conveyor belt?
No, we don't. Ah I see, so what you're advocating is retirement? I think we agree!
You do seem to be pushing hard against something though. It comes off as both arrogant and naive, and leads to misinterpretation.
For someone who's just saying "consider your options", it sure seems like you think you're saying a lot more than that.
What, exactly, is wrong with new kitchens?