Someone or something is claiming copyright to the content. Period.
"Don't read too much into it" is a smokescreen. They are claiming copyright, are you trying to change the facts?
"Don't read too much into it" is a smokescreen. They are claiming copyright, are you trying to change the facts?
"Text of a July 2, 2013, letter to Edward Snowden from his father and
father’s attorney
Here is the text of the open letter Lon Snowden, along with his attorney,
Bruce Fein, wrote to NSA leaker Edward Snowden. The letter was provided
to The Associated Press."
Even without that (or if my understanding of a derivative work is incorrect) you are construing mechanical output of boilerplate CMS content as a specific intent to claim copyright, an assertion which lacks supporting evidence.
We should not necessarily ascribe to malice what can be explained through lack of functionality.