http://i.imgur.com/VcqqSN9.jpg
You see questions with 400 upvotes closed by some user who has been on the site for 6 months and is autistic about earning internet points.
http://i.imgur.com/VcqqSN9.jpg
You see questions with 400 upvotes closed by some user who has been on the site for 6 months and is autistic about earning internet points.
Do you have any example 400+ upvoted questions you can point to that aren't of the type "everybody bring out all the snippets you've been saving, this time we're putting on a show"?
It's not complicated: questions and answers. This is common in sitebuilding though: "so unique we are." Well, at the end of the day it's just posts and comments, so quit milkin' it. A question that receives answers fits, I don't know how you could say otherwise.
However, this is all just a nice example of NIH Syndrome on SO's part, since these are lessons that have been learned by anybody who's hung out in a large IRC channel with kick/ban bots and arrogant ops, as well as being practiced on a web level for over 10 years by the likes of Metafilter.
It also reads to me like they want to have their cake and eat it too. They want the community part without the humanity, since people's irrelevancies in questions fall into more than the 6 (or however many) preset reasons for closure. This may be an incontrovertible attribute of SO: their "model" (as criticized above) does not allow for the community, "topical identity" if you will, they are seeking to impose themselves,.
Yeah, if you're trying to re-create Yahoo! Answers.
You may not realize it, but language like this is not only grammatically incorrect (you can't be autistic about something), but could be pretty offensive to people who are either autistic or have a friend or family member who is.
Why use a neural development disorder as a derogatory term?
Because it's derogatory to accuse someone of disordered neural development.
I didn't say autistic as an insult to those people but as a way to colorfully describe behaviour that is typical of people with autism.
Would be wonderful to see a complementary service to stackexchange's (with the HN community that might be a possible venture? ;)), but in most of the cases I can recall, Quora is just that. Quora has the same "noise" problems as stackoverflow, what with "which ipod is best? lol", but for genuinely interesting questions, meta or opinionbased, Quora is the place I most often see that.
You pick "off-topic" and is asks if it would be "on-topic" somewhere else and offers some suggestions.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Psychonaut/comments/o1zjo/ban_memes_...
I can only pray that SO doesn't fall victim to it too and I support the admins in restricting content as long as it is subject to oversight and is not overdone.