> It is a pretty weird world we live in where nudity is automatically pornography.
It may be a fine point, but I think the distinction that clarifies the problem is "...where nudity is automatically pornography to somebody".
It may be a fine point, but I think the distinction that clarifies the problem is "...where nudity is automatically pornography to somebody".
The question is whether or not we're cool with that. Most of the time, yep. Some other times, nope.
The problem with these mass hysteria "think of the children" problems is that they're almost all universally solved for in one of two ways: True thought-police or absolute control of media and censorship.