Your comment pisses on every person who ever went to school to study criminal law, many of whom did so for noble or at least neutral reasons.
Unless you are doing this:
http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2011/01/secret_government...
It is not as though this is some kind of new, unprecedented behavior either:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/03/31/mlk.fbi.conspiracy/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Edgar_Hoover
So let's say a young man is thinking about joining the FBI; he wants to do good for the world, maybe help catch a serial killer or take down a child abuse group. How does he know he will not be asked to conduct surveillance on an anti-war group? How does he know he will not be asked to dig up some dirt on a civil rights leader?
This "honorable profession" you are defending has always had a dark side.
The "Stanford Prison Experiment" is a good example of this phenomenon: http://www.thoughtcrime.org/blog/career-advice/
I would absolutely hate the USA to go the way of Russia, USSR, China or many others. Unfortunately we are headed in that direction.
Yeah right, and bittorrent is mainly used for distributing Debian ISOs.
I'm against government surveillance, but your statement is way too broad.
Only one reason? Really? You don't think anybody goes into law enforcement to protect others, curb violence, and generally do good for the world?
I doubt you'd want your profession to be slandered so casually.
Would you like the authority and power to prevent women from being raped? Would you like the power to vote to implement laws equalizing 'rights', such as same-sex marriages?
I see 'power' as 'the ability to realize my will' and I think you're extending it to 'power over other people,' which does imply that, at some point, it will conflict with someone's legitimate (not saying who is to decide what is legitimate) pursuit of well-being.
I think perhaps we also disagree on the definition of 'evil', but I'm not interested in debating this online. This discussion requires beers and scarred wooden furniture. :-)