Hacker News Reader

Comment by aclevernickname | Hacker News Reader

Ah. so the XBO/PS4 has two more cores than my PC, and the chip itself has more in common with the Atom-clone E-450 chip than the A10. that's maybe a $120 upgrade in December if I want to match it core-for-core, and everything else is already on-par. Thanks for the agreement that there's nothing on the XBO that outclasses my little PC.

Can you point me towards any documentation on AMD using VLIW cores? I thought the VLIW movement died with Transmeta. Also, if you could provide me with documentation that AMD isn't using the same-gen GPU cores in the XBO/PS4 that they put in the A10 (Southern Islands - Radeon 7XXX), I'd really appreciate that as well.

I wouldn't dare boot windows on a 256MB PC. it wouldn't run. However, I could do the very same thing with a Linux PC (you know, a PS3) without much issue. In fact, while typing this, I used Chef to deploy a 256MB VM running Lubuntu 13.04. :)

View on HN

Seriously? You think 6+2 equals 8 and 6 is on par with 12 and 18 and then ask me to point at technical documentation readily available at the AMD website? What are you going to do with that, it many grades beyond basic arithmetics.

very interesting. I was looking on AMD's website for info on the Jaguar cores, and couldn't find any. Perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place?

so, I'm not sure what Very Long Instruction Word being implemented in the A10 cores has to do with whether or not I understand basic arithmetic, so I'm going to assume you don't have any information on that, and will disregard that part of your grandparent post accordingly.

I'll take your silence about how the A10 is a much faster CPU than the low-power equivalent in the XBO/PS4 as agreement to these statements. Seems all we're doing is haggling over how much faster the GPU(s) in this unit are compared to the A10. I haven't found anything on AMD's site explaining these cores. I'd ask you to point me toward some documentation, but I expect you to return with an ad hominem again.

I'll also take your silence about how much more efficient linux can be with 256MB of RAM than windows as your agreement to these facts.

Still looking forward to any Jaguar-related documentation that you can find on AMD's site that covers my questions. thanks in advance.

I don't think you can find info on the Jaguar core on their website. Why are you looking for a CPU core info now, though? I thought you wanted to find if AMD GPU (note, letter C is not the same as G) in your PC uses VLIW, and somehow being reluctant to use web search (like this http://www.bing.com/search?q=amd+a10+vliw ). I am sorry, I cannot help you with navigating AMD website - it's dog slow and poorly organized. Also, disregard all I say, you, obviously know better. And sure, my silence means I agree with your idiocy, and not doing something else, like not checking HN comments.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com