Apart from that the language is very solid and has some nice decisions made about it.
row.Int(3) returns the 4th column as an int, row.Str(3) as a string, etc. Works fine for me.
would you mind pointing those out please ? thank you !
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5451651
There are others if you look for them.
My hope is that Go continues to improve in this direction as it seems like a good language.
Go advocates desperately, desperately need to avoid the temptation to explain to themselves why Erlang isn't as good, because then they'll fail to learn the lessons that Erlang learned the easy way. There's a lot of ways to improve on Erlang, but let me tell you that despite those opportunities, Erlang as a language is one of the wisest languages around, you do not want to try to exceed it by starting from scratch. Learn from it, please, I want a better Erlang than Erlang, but talking yourself into how Go is already better than Erlang isn't going to get you there.
https://www.braintreepayments.com/braintrust/gotchas-irritan...
Although it's kinda debatable how much Go can be blamed about these failures.