Google’s programming language, Go, gets a big speed boost
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
But more on topic. This has happened ever since I first started frequenting this site in 2009 (2008?). People upvote links that interest them almost without regard to whether it's already on the frontpage. Personally, I like it. When the first article on topic A gets posted and you get 300 comments, it becomes unwieldy to join in the conversation. The other discussions tend to focus on other issues with topic A or are simply easier to join in on since there are fewer comments overall.
Can you gess which one?
Are you going to be at the Erlang User Conference next month? I will enjoy putting messages in your inbox while you fail fast attempting to walk and drink at the same time.
http://www.erlang-factory.com/conference/ErlangUserConferenc...
Incredibly touching, and sad.
Apart from that the language is very solid and has some nice decisions made about it.
row.Int(3) returns the 4th column as an int, row.Str(3) as a string, etc. Works fine for me.
would you mind pointing those out please ? thank you !
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5451651
There are others if you look for them.
My hope is that Go continues to improve in this direction as it seems like a good language.
Go advocates desperately, desperately need to avoid the temptation to explain to themselves why Erlang isn't as good, because then they'll fail to learn the lessons that Erlang learned the easy way. There's a lot of ways to improve on Erlang, but let me tell you that despite those opportunities, Erlang as a language is one of the wisest languages around, you do not want to try to exceed it by starting from scratch. Learn from it, please, I want a better Erlang than Erlang, but talking yourself into how Go is already better than Erlang isn't going to get you there.
https://www.braintreepayments.com/braintrust/gotchas-irritan...
Although it's kinda debatable how much Go can be blamed about these failures.