Its understandable given the computers of the time. But I suspect that at some point, you'll probably want to talk about quality, which so many programmers have discussed.
David Parnas would be a more suitable candidate, if you really want to name it after someone. But I'd like to point out that you may not want to name the oath after a person unless they are involved in drafting it.
Dijkstra, for example, spoke frequently on the topic of being ethical as a programmer / professor. Out of respect, I would never name something like this after him unless I could back up every word with his various papers.
Of course it's not the same thing, and I'd never argue that he was wrong to do it given the circumstances, but Turing's career was built on reading other people's communications against their will.