The internet works the way it is now because of the concept of 'free and open' information. Attempting to harm the ones that enable such open-ness isn't exactly the right recipe for a long term successful Internet based business model.
The internet works the way it is now because of the concept of 'free and open' information. Attempting to harm the ones that enable such open-ness isn't exactly the right recipe for a long term successful Internet based business model.
Currently both buyers as well as sellers have been trained that the place to go is Craigslist. Give that it would be impossible for a new service to have anywhere near the number of buyers and sellers as Craigslist, no rational individual is going to choose an alternative.
The problem becomes even tricker since Craigslist is for the most part free. They currently use the revenue gained by job postings to subsidize the other listings on their site. This makes it harder for a niche service to start up as they are competing with free.
Notoriously difficult to dethrone. Craigslist being such a piece of crap for so long is an object lesson in the power of network effects.
Afai recall, CL is being pushed into corners by people who desperately want to eat it alive.
Further - users like CL. As much as people wax on about how features and a UI will make a big difference, fact is that in its geography people don't really care about that.
There's also a chart out there showing that CL is being disrupted, in that several silos its present in have alternate service providers.
I must further point out that the ideological posturing at the end assumes that the next firm who comes in, and adds yet another middleman to the chain, will let the data be free and open.
Should they end up consuming/transitioning most of CLs base, who is to say they won't institute a lock in of some sort.
And a YC firm definitely can't operate on the same budgetary and revenue constraints CL imposes on itself.
New shiny is emphatically not needed here.