Explain? Is this some offshoot from the original Creative Commons licenses that Aaron co-invented?
(This parallels the distinction between free software, on the one hand, and freeware and shareware, on the other hand.)
I don't recall Aaron's views about this issue, so I'm not asserting that he would have been upset about this. It should probably be possible to find documentation of his opinions.
Sure, it's easier to mashup video than compiled executables or libraries, but even CC is not quite equivalent to a software license.
WE HAVE ALSO DECIDED AFTER THE FILM IS COMPLETED TO RELEASE THE RAW INTERVIEW FOOTAGE AND POST IT TO THE INTERNET ARCHIVE IN SAN FRANCISCO THROUGH A SIMILAR CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.
(caps in original)