Would you agree though, that women, historically, have been the greater share of sexual harassment and assault victims between the two genders? If so, then to call these reforms the machinations of overbearing feminists would to, some degree, be stating the obvious...because, it is not a surprise that the group most concerned with women being disenfranchised as victims here would be women, and that those women would also be feminists.

Now to argue that this attempted reform has become corrupted by overbearing feminists, then I ask: to what end? The motive is not clear and I think the simpler explanation is that sexual harassment and assault is by its very nature hard to investigate and adjudicate, and that these difficulties alone can cause the school's disciplinary system to go awry. Or are you arguing that in cases of sexual harassment between males (such as a homophobic attack or male on male rape), that things go just fine for all parties involved because no feminists are there to exert undue forces on the proceedings?