I've tried learning Rust twice. Once when 0.4 was announced, and then again a few days ago because of 0.6. Both times I read the entire tutorial and manual, and poked around the standard libraries. But both times I ran in to the same problems. Both the tutorial and manual contradict each other in places, and contradict themselves in places too (e.g. I saw both &'r foo and &r/foo syntaxes in the 0.6 manual). The manual is also full of broken links (every time it referenced another section of the manual, the link didn't actually do anything). And the tutorial doesn't actually have anything for you to do as you work along it, it's basically just a rephrased manual with a bunch of tiny code snippets. The library documentation is formatted really poorly and makes it hard to figure out how you're supposed to do something. And just in general, there's no good examples of how to actually write idiomatic Rust code, or how to write a full program.
I recognize that it's a work in progress, which does excuse a lot, but these problems do act as a significant barrier to actually using the language. I'd love to actually start writing Rust programs, but when I look at it, it just feels like I'd be better off waiting until the next release and hoping it's better. Which is a real shame, because a lot of what you're trying to do with the language really appeals to me.
Contrast this with the state of the Go documentation / learning material when it was announced. I was able to dive right in to that language, figure out how to write idiomatic code in it, and produce programs.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, I wish you guys would start putting more effort into the documentation side of things.