Also, "People-Powered Customer Support" doesn't really convey what they say it conveys. All customer support is people-powered. 'Community-Powered Customer Support' or 'Customer-Powered Support' would be more accurate.
And as others have suggested, "Get Satisfaction has no affiliation with X" is much better that 'X is not yet participating'
Your phrasing might be more logical, but the phrasing that the page currently has is the phrasing that sounds best to native speakers' ears.
The simples English words sometimes have the trickiest definitions.
I recall that "be" takes multiple pages of the Oxford English Dictionary.
With regard to "of", I think that definition #8 here
http://www.yourdictionary.com/of
"concerning; about; with reference to - 'think well of me'"
is the way it's being used.
I disagree. I ask a favor OF someone. I ask a question TO someone.
This is actually a very interesting question. You'd say "Cyberdyne Customers" is an indirect object.
I give Cyberdyne Customers a cookie. I give a cookie to Cyberdyne Customers. I ask Cyberdyne Customers a question. *I ask a question to Cyberdyne Customers.
Why is the last form incorrect? What rules apply here? If you're interested in questions like this, I can recommend Steven Pinker's "The Stuff of Thought" ( http://www.amazon.com/Stuff-Thought-Language-Window-Nature/d... )
"Christine, that's all I ask of you." - Andrew Lloyd Weber
"Nor would I ask of any fellow American in defense of his freedom that which I would not gladly give myself - my life before my liberty." - Manchurian Candidate
"And ask of you forgiveness; and so we’ll live," - Shakespeare (King Lear)
These classic lines have made their mark on our culture and/or the English language.
The notable exception to this is when "to" is used to show cause, i.e.
The student asked permission [in order] to go to the bathroom
The man asked a question [in order] to understand the answer
Not in English you don't.