So ima take the hit of being a stupid person and ask, what's the difference? Why should I use this over bootstrap-wysihtml5 (or why should I use bootstrap-wysihtml5 over this)?
- wysihtml5 minimised is 112K + 20k for bootstrap-wysihtml5, without styles and images... this is only 5k, non-minimised.
- we bind hotkeys for common operations automatically (eg cmd+b for bold etc)
- drag&drop for images
- automatically upload images using filereader, not just provide links
- good support for touch devices
- no magic around toolbar, so you can use your own styling
- we don't force an inline iframe which mirrors a text area, which wysihtml5 does
Wysihtml5 has a better support for older browsers, the bootstrap skin has toolbar translations, so I'd still use that if you don't want a custom toolbar or need to support older browsers
Does your editor allow this kind of control?
Btw, for the drag and drop inserting of images. You should probably check the url of the image and if it is from local file storage then upload it to the server and insert the resulting link back. That would be a cool feature to have in a editor.
For server uploads, this would be pretty easy as a callback.
There's definitely a need for a good bootstrap wysiwig form.
I didn't like forced sanitization in wysihtml5, so we added an optional method .cleanHtml - you can just use the normal jquery html method to get the non sanitized contents, or call cleanHtml() to get trailing empty divs, <br/> and whitespace removed