I'd also be lying if I didn't mention that I truly believe the sort of project we are building in Discourse does represent most future software.
You know, it's great to believe in what you build and all, but being modest sometimes would be nice.
You know, it's great to believe in what you build and all, but being modest sometimes would be nice.
He qualified it pretty well. It could have been:
> Discourse represents the future of software.
Wouldn't that have been more arrogant?