I quoted the segment where I think the statement makes reference to the DDoS.
It is open to interpretation, but I don’t think it’s an unreasonable interpretation.
The bit you quoted makes no reference to the DDoS. You decided that the quoted text implied that. You then talk about interpretation, having claimed a specific reference that doesn't exist. You can't have it both ways.
The bit you quoted makes no reference to the DDoS. You decided that the quoted text implied that. You then talk about interpretation, having claimed a specific reference that doesn't exist.