This explains why Canadians, including MPs, sometimes come to the US for care, and why the Queen of England went to a private hospital when she developed gastroenteritis, right? It's silly to imagine that there isn't or shouldn't be a relationship between level of care and cost of care, even if we desire for the costs of most common life-saving care to be "socialized" in some way. Demanding that all care be the best possible care is a non-starter because that's clearly not financially feasible. Some folks can afford to spend multiples of the average per capita GDP on their health care, and that's just not physically possible for everyone to do.
As for your straw man about a "fully private system", I made no mention of that, nor have I advocated such. I was merely making an isolated point. You can put your pitchforks back in the shed and put down your "libertarianism = somalia!" signs.
Our system is clearly broken, but the idea that other systems aren't also broken in various ways is naive. There's no silver bullet that will solve the problems of cost and access to health care, and that includes the extraordinarily naive idea of just making "government" pay for it all.